🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is seeking compensation totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened reciprocal measures, such as seizing EU private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a key position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the new legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in European nations are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if relevant assets can be identified," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are developing measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Ukraine would solely be required to repay the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "It also sends a clear signal that when you do all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."